11:36 Jan 10, 2006 |
English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] Tech/Engineering - Metallurgy / Casting / Tube worker | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Dave Calderhead Netherlands Local time: 04:53 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +10 | issued to? |
| ||
4 | This person is the carrier of this certificate |
| ||
3 +1 | awarded to |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
issued to? Explanation: sounds like a poor translation that spuld be issued to this person, and whether it bears the person's name would depend on the type of certificate. more context might help -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 7 mins (2006-01-10 11:44:38 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- should read 'should be "issued to this person"' -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 10 mins (2006-01-10 11:47:31 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Definitely think it should read issued to this person and that the person's name is on the certificate. Then any client/customer can ask to see the certificate if the person is doing the work for which he or she has undergone the training. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||