português term
nem tal podera ser alegado para descumprimento de .......
Thks again!
PRO (1): David Hollywood
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
nor can this be claimed as a reson for failure to comply...
nor this can be an excuse for the violation of...
Thks Ivan! |
Thanks guys, I actually gave Ivan the benifit of the doubt re "nor can this//" - i was thinking using "breach"i/o "violation"???? |
disagree |
coolbrowne
: Word order is not optional: it must be "nor can this". Moreover, "descumprimento" is weaker than "violation" (contravenção), merely a lack of compliance
3 horas
|
Mantenho a sugestão; todo descumprimento de uma obrigação contratual é a violação de um dever "ex pacto". Contudo, fico grato por sua atenção em comentar.
|
this cannot be asserted for failure to comply with . . .
this cannot be asserted for failure to comply with . . .
Thks David |
Something went wrong...