Glossary entry

French term or phrase:

constituer

English translation:

which is

Added to glossary by Jean-Claude Gouin
Aug 2, 2016 12:01
7 yrs ago
4 viewers *
French term

constituer

French to English Bus/Financial Advertising / Public Relations
Is there any doubt in this sentence that the entrant in this contest has indeed won the gold ingot?
"Dans cette enveloppe, vous trouverez le lingot d’or qui constitue le Prix qui vous a été attribué pour votre participation à notre Jeu-concours."

In my mind it is being directly implied that the person has won, when in reality they have only qualified to take part in the final draw for the ingot.
TIA for your help.
Change log

Aug 16, 2016 12:13: Jean-Claude Gouin Created KOG entry

Discussion

Jonathan MacKerron (asker) Aug 2, 2016:
Think I've found the solution The first prize is a gold bar worth €32k, all other prizes consist of vouchers to buy the sponsor's products. At the time the vouchers are sent out to the "winners", further participants qualify for the final draw and are sent a "gold ingot" (probably plastic or cardboard or whatever) as a PR gag.
Need to confirm this with the client, but it is the only interpretation that makes sense.
Jonathan MacKerron (asker) Aug 2, 2016:
Next paragraph Je profite de cette occasion pour vous confirmer que votre nom figure parmi
ceux qui se trouvent dans la liste à partir de laquelle a été tiré au sort le gagnant de la cagnotte de 32 000 euros, comme indiqué dans le règlement que nous vous avons envoyé. Alors, vous avez une chance réelle de vous voir attribuer ce montant.
The ingot is worth €32k.
philgoddard Aug 2, 2016:
Why do you say they haven't won? Is this based on the rest of the text and, if so, what does it say?

Proposed translations

+2
45 mins
Selected

which is

vous trouverez le lingot d’or qui CONSTITUE le Prix qui vous a été attribué = you will find the gold ingot WHICH IS the prize ...
Peer comment(s):

agree Nikki Scott-Despaigne : It "is" in fact the prize... for taking part; no more no less.
32 mins
Merci Nikki ...
agree mimi 254
21 hrs
Merci mimi 254 ...
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
+2
32 mins

ambiguous - can be read two ways...

\"Dans cette enveloppe, vous trouverez le lingot d’or qui constitue le Prix qui vous a été attribué pour votre participation à notre Jeu-concours.\"

In this envelope, you will find the gold ingot which is the prize that you will be playing for when you take part in our draw.

Your first reading is the second interpretation and the French is perhaps even deliberately obscure !
I presume, if you read on, that it is clear that ingot may have different values or that the ingot is only one of several potential prizes.
Peer comment(s):

agree writeaway : yes: you will find the gold ingot which is the prize
4 hrs
agree mimi 254 : which is
21 hrs
Something went wrong...
32 mins

to represent

my take
Something went wrong...
59 mins

"constitutes"

In this envelope you will find the gold ingot which constitutes the price that was assigned to you for your participation in our draw

Actually, it’s not completely clear. The expression “qui vous a été attribué” might mean that 1)the gold ingot was assigned to the entrant in this contest, to receive in case he wins the contest; or 2) it’s an award and the entrant has won it.
Something went wrong...
7 hrs

Which

In this envelope you will find the gold ingot, which was awarded to you for participating in our contest, or for your participation in our contest.

Another option, maybe?

Good luck!
Something went wrong...

Reference comments

1 hr
Reference:

puff, puffery

This is an advertising puff type thing. See the Wikipedia entry here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffery

In law, puffery is a promotional statement or claim that expresses subjective rather than objective views, which no "reasonable person" would take literally.[1] Puffery serves to "puff up" an exaggerated image of what is being described and is especially featured in testimonials.

All first year EN law students know of the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892] EWCA Civ 1, [1893] 1 QB 256, [1893] QB 256 which you can find here : http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/1892/1.html

This is one such. No reasonable person would imagine that the said gold lingot is anything more than a gadgety idea. It is meant to be ambiguous, but it is also meant for the "reasonable man" to realise that it's not a real lingot!
Note from asker:
Thanks. It's clear to me now, but due to the dearth of additional information I couldn't see the forest for the trees when I posed the question.
Peer comments on this reference comment:

agree Daryo
10 hrs
agree Yolanda Broad
13 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search