Feb 1, 2017 10:26
7 yrs ago
1 viewer *
English term
alum/non-alum wheat
English to Polish
Other
Agriculture
It [the study] was great because they showed that when they switched these people who had inflammatory bowel syndrome to an organic alum version of wheat, their symptoms went way down. (1:06:25)
'Cause the wheat has been evolving. It's not so much GMO, but they do use these genetic... other kinds of genetic manipulations, so the wheat that we have today is not the same as the alum wheat. But the fact that they made it organic to me is the key fact that made it healthy. They need to do the experiment again when they do, you know, the organic non-alum wheat and see if they get a similar result. (1:07:01)
Dzięki!
'Cause the wheat has been evolving. It's not so much GMO, but they do use these genetic... other kinds of genetic manipulations, so the wheat that we have today is not the same as the alum wheat. But the fact that they made it organic to me is the key fact that made it healthy. They need to do the experiment again when they do, you know, the organic non-alum wheat and see if they get a similar result. (1:07:01)
Dzięki!
Proposed translations
(Polish)
| 3 | antyczna (pradawna) pszenica / (wspólczesna) organiczna pszenica |
geopiet
|
Change log
Feb 1, 2017 10:26: changed "Kudoz queue" from "In queue" to "Public"
Proposed translations
43 mins
Selected
antyczna (pradawna) pszenica / (wspólczesna) organiczna pszenica
wygrzebałem wywiad ze Stephanie Seneff, gdzie jest poruszany ten sam temat .. -
-------
ALV: If you had a lab, what experimental research would you do to test your theory on glyphosate and Celiac disease?
SS: Take people with Celiac disease and put them on an organic diet. Or take people with inflammatory bowel disease, because that's sort of related - in fact, a paper was just published where they put people with inflammatory bowel disease on an organic wheat diet. This wheat was an ancient heirloom wheat.
The theory in this paper is that it's the new forms of wheat that are causing inflammatory bowel disease, because the wheat itself has evolved. We've been genetically modifying wheat, through the traditional evolutionary process that we've used in the past. Not the GMO but other ways of manipulating the genes. So wheat today is not the same as the original ancient wheat.
With this paper they weren't thinking about glyphosate, but I suspect that what they ended up doing was show that glyphosate is causing the inflammatory bowel disease because they used organic ancient wheat compared to non-organic modern wheat.
You'd have to measure the glyphosate in the food, obviously, to see if it was there. And you could do some kind of controlled dietary experiment on humans. Or you could do something like that on rats, too, where you could be less ethical, I suppose.
READ MORE: http://www.disclose.tv/news/Meet_the_controversial_MIT_scien...
-------
ALV: If you had a lab, what experimental research would you do to test your theory on glyphosate and Celiac disease?
SS: Take people with Celiac disease and put them on an organic diet. Or take people with inflammatory bowel disease, because that's sort of related - in fact, a paper was just published where they put people with inflammatory bowel disease on an organic wheat diet. This wheat was an ancient heirloom wheat.
The theory in this paper is that it's the new forms of wheat that are causing inflammatory bowel disease, because the wheat itself has evolved. We've been genetically modifying wheat, through the traditional evolutionary process that we've used in the past. Not the GMO but other ways of manipulating the genes. So wheat today is not the same as the original ancient wheat.
With this paper they weren't thinking about glyphosate, but I suspect that what they ended up doing was show that glyphosate is causing the inflammatory bowel disease because they used organic ancient wheat compared to non-organic modern wheat.
You'd have to measure the glyphosate in the food, obviously, to see if it was there. And you could do some kind of controlled dietary experiment on humans. Or you could do something like that on rats, too, where you could be less ethical, I suppose.
READ MORE: http://www.disclose.tv/news/Meet_the_controversial_MIT_scien...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Discussion
the only think that makes sense, is the "old wheat" ..
we all know, that
wheat today is not the same as the wheat consumed by people only thirty to fifty years ago
wheat today is not the same as the wheat of our grandparents
wheat today is not the same as the wheat in the olden days
wheat today is not the same as the wheat eaten many years ago
wheat today is not the same as the wheat of the Bible